Artificial Intelligence
Squirrel AI Learning organizes Workshops at the ASU+GSV Global Educational Technology Summit for an In-depth Discussion on the Development and Future Innovation of AI+ Education
Lately, the tenth ASU+GSV Global Educational Technology Summit was held in San Diego, CA, USA. Co-founded in 2010 by the Arizona State University (ASU) and Global Silicon Valley (GSV), the ASU+GSV Summit aims to improve learning and career outcomes by promoting innovations on a large scale. It is a high-level grand event on educational technology in the USA and even the world.
Derek Haoyang Li, the founder of Squirrel AI Learning by Yixue Group, was invited to attend this year’s ASU+GSV Summit, where he made comprehensive discussions on educational technology innovations with more than 4,500 educational technology experts from all over the world. The Squirrel AI Learning team organized two workshops during the summit for an in-depth discussion on the future development and innovation of AI+ education with other participants at the ASU+GSV Summit.
AI Education Standardization
The first workshop was held to discuss the opportunities for standardization of AI in education based on the IEEE’s adaptive instructional system.
The attendees of the workshop include:
- Richard Tong, Chief Architect of Squirrel AI Learning;
- Bob Sottilare, Chair of IEEE AIS Workgroup, Science Director, Intelligent Training at Soar Tech
- Avron Barr, Chair of IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee
- Robby Robson, Member of Board of Governors IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) and former Chair of IEEE AIS Workgroup, Science Director, Intelligent Training at Soar Tech
At the workshop, the four speakers presented and discussed the current status of the IEEE-related adaptive instruction system, including its design, standardization and best practices. They analyzed the opportunities for applying standardization components and procedures, including AI adaptive learning technology, AI-based recommendation engine and a machine learning-based system used to simulate students’ interactions and preferences to improve their learning outcomes, to the AI education system.
Richard Tong: AI redefines the Education Industry
As an addresser, Richard Tong, chief architect of Squirrel AI Learning, gave a speech on the significance and implications of applying AI to education.
In Richard’s view, educational technology influences the industry in the following four technical aspects:
- Substitution, like a transition from the blackboard to the whiteboard;
- Enhancement, with a technology replacing something existing;
- Modification, with learning paths offered, such as behavior or project-based learning
- Redefinition.
Richard further explained, “In our opinion, what AI is to do is redefine. Redefinition means that we are actually changing the educational paradigm, and the whole process has in effect been changed. Therefore, we don’t aim to develop a learning model like an assembly line, but to make an individualized model that is truly extendable. We have seen in our work the significance of AI to education, and that’s why we have come with all commitments for standardization. ”
According to Richard, the successful implementation of AI calls for four elements: business model, professional knowledge, data and computing. Computing power is a broad concept, reflected not only in the number of GPUs and cloud services, but also in stacks and basic computing facilities.
Robby Robson: Why must the adaptive instructional system (AIS) be standardized?
Robby Robson, Member of Board of Governors of IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) and former Chair of IEEE AIS Workgroup, gave a speech on the significance and implications of standardizing the AIS.
According to Robby, there are three important goals of standardization.
- To reduce the friction in the supply chain. From a perspective of business, standards can cut down consumption costs and stimulate producers to make innovations. All innovations and paradigm shifts can be promoted with standardization.
- To help the industry better identify the quality of technology. Due to its very high popularity, the word AI has become a marketing hype. Bob Sottilare criticized many education providers for exaggerating the role of AI, and pointed out that they just regarded AI as a tool for contextual marketing.
- To provide baselines for research and analysis.
Robby also gave a brief presentation of the background of IEEE. As a huge global organization, IEEE has more than 450,000 members and many associations for different discipline categories. Robson’s employer IEEE-SA is a global agency made up of more than 7,000 members and more than 300 corporate members. IEEE-SA focuses on industrially recognized standards, and it is concerned about their application to the market and market interdependence, and provides relevant legal and ethical protection.
Avron Barr: The key to the implementation of AI lies in data reorganization and integration
Avron Barr, Chair of IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee, gave a speech on the data of the AIS. He said, “The market must adjust itself to make the AIS and other AI AI-enhanced products economically viable, but the key issue is: where is the data required for all these AI systems?”
To support an open, AI-based ecosystem, the whole society must build new basic facilities to recollect, share and integrate data. The data comes mainly from five main areas: identity management (personal information), qualifications (capabilities), history (what was done in the past, and what needs to be done subjectively), activity data (e.g., the information on social media, geographical information, etc.), and content. All relevant data owners, such as schools, governments, school districts and businesses, need to get involved to share their data with others to form a large-scale database.
According to Avron, the IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee has got involved in the establishment of many standards, including the SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model) ten-year update, xAPI 2.0, student data governance and federal machine learning.
Bob Sottilare: Adaptive System Standards and Practices
The adaptive system is a computer-based program that can be used to guide learning in accordance with every learner or team’s objective, demand and preference. It recommends an intelligent tutoring system, intelligent instructor and intelligent medium.
As the Chair of IEEE AIS Workgroup, Bob welcomed educators to his work to develop conceptual approaches, set interoperability criteria and recommend practical methods to teachers.
At the workshop, Richard Tong introduced some of the activities and conferences on AI and education to be held this year:
ICICLE 2019 (2019 ICICLE Conference on Learning Engineering) will be held in Ellington, Virginia from May 20th to May 23rd. The conference will focus on learning engineering, make an in-depth discussion on learning, knowledge-based learning experience design, learning conditions and support technologies, and touch upon how the emerging learning engineering can solve the issues of privacy and personalization.
AIAED 2019 (2019 Artificial Intelligence + Adaptive Education) will be held in Beijing from May 24th to 25th. This international forum, held for academic researchers and industry leaders, will focus on AI and other important technologies applied to the next generation of education and how these technologies will influence human adaptive learning.
AIED 2019 (International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education), will be held in Chicago from June 25th to 29th. Themed by “Education for All People in the 21st Century”, and the conference will focus on how AI and advanced technologies can be used to implement equal education among all people.
IJCAI 2019 Workshop: AI-based multi-modal analysis, used to understand human learning at realistic educational environment workshops.
Knowledge Structure-based AIS
The speaker at the second workshop was Dr. Dan Bindman, Chief Data Scientist of Squirrel AI Learning.
Dr. Bindman graduated from Mathematical Behavioral Science Institute, University of California-Irvine with a doctor’s degree in 2002. Later, he joined ALEKS, a leading provider of online adaptive learning in the USA, concentrating on mathematics and chemistry, and became the editorial director and chief architect of ALEKS math products. He joined Squirrel AI Learning in 2018.
Dr. Dan Bindman’s speech was titled “Understanding the Advantages and Disadvantages of the Knowledge Structure-based Adaptive Instructional System, and New Ways to Address the Disadvantages” and divided into two parts:
First, he pointed out the advantages and disadvantages of the knowledge structure-based adaptive learning model, and expounded the knowledge point structure and knowledge point state, as well as their differences and the logical links in the knowledge point structure.
Then, he highlighted the PKS optimization model he had developed. Composed of multi-layered student ability groups and more than 20,000 model parameters, the PKS model can accurately judge individual students and groups’ real-time learning status and provide personalized learning content for each of them. It can remove the weaknesses of many similar systems with all their advantages retained.
What is a knowledge structure?
A knowledge structure is essentially a bridge among all problems in a course. For example, a typical algebra course may contain 500-1,000 problems (i.e., “knowledge points”). One problem may involve an “equation”, while another may involve the “calculation of a slope”.
Problems that are highly related to each other can be linked together. If all such problems are linked together in one course, they can form a knowledge structure, which plays a key role in effectively assessing students’ knowledge and learning capacity.
What is a knowledge state?
Students’ knowledge states can be expressed as a vector that represents the knowledge or their mastery of all problems in a course. It is worth noting that Students’ knowledge states are binary for all problems, i.e., “known” or “unknown”, or seen as “1” or “0”.
For example, a course contains 1000 problems, and students’ mastery of knowledge can be expressed as {0,1,1,……,1,1} through the vector.
What’s the relationship between the knowledge states and knowledge structure?
It depends on whether there is a connection among different problems. Dr. Bindman enumerated two extreme possibilities: “completely unconnected” and “completely interconnected”.
Suppose there are 3 problems in a course. If the problems are completely unconnected, the likelihood that a student masters these problems is equal to “3 squared”, i.e., 8, ({0,0,0}, {0,0,1}…{1,1,1}).
However, if the three problems are interconnected with difficulty increasing progressively, it means that the student will have little difficulty solving easy problems if he overcomes the difficult problem. The number of his knowledge points can be reduced to 4: ({0,0,0}, {1,0,0}, {1,1,0}, {1,1,1}).
By analogy, we can guess that there will be fewer knowledge states if problems are more interconnected; on the contrary, there will be more knowledge states if problems are less interconnected.
So Dr. Bindman asked another question: how many questions do you need to ask to understand a student’s knowledge states?
Based on the above conclusion, if problems are completely unconnected, you need to ask 1,000 questions to get the answer; on the contrary, if problems are related to each other with difficulty increasing progressively, you just need to ask 10 questions: Ask the 500th question first. If the student gives a correct answer, continue to ask him a more difficult ones: the 750th; if he fails to give a correct answer, continue to ask him an easier one selected from the medians.
How to apply the knowledge structure to adaptive learning?
In view of Dr. Bindman’s introduction, the knowledge structure links different problems together, and a student must master some essential knowledge before beginning to learn a particular problem. Besides, the knowledge structure can greatly reduce the number of questions asked to assess the student’s mastery of knowledge. Of course, an issue will therefore arise: the knowledge structure must contain a lot of connections if it is used to assess a student’s knowledge states.
The connections can also be divided into different types: logical connections and experiential connections. The former is based on the logical relationship among problem contents; the latter is based on the correlation of probabilistic data among problems. The above is a conclusion drawn based on data collected. For example, a student who can solve problem A can also solve problem B. That’s an experiential connection.
Why is an experiential connection important? This is because logical connection features sparse data, and you don’t have enough experts to do manual annotations. An experiential connection can generate a lot of data, although problems still arise, because some experiential connections are inconsistent in sequence with textbook knowledge.
Another challenge posed by the knowledge structure comes from forms of curriculum. If a student guesses right a lot of questions, there will be something wrong with the knowledge structure-based assessment. Relatively speaking, the knowledge structure is applicable to courses in mathematics, chemistry and physics because there are many fill-in questions in such courses; on the contrary, it does not apply to courses in Chinese or English due to a large number of choice questions.
The last challenge comes from nature of the knowledge structure itself. Mastering knowledge is not absolutely a binary problem. For some knowledge, you can solve problems even if you just master 80% or 60% of it. In this case, the knowledge structure cannot accurately assess whether you have mastered the relevant knowledge points.
In summary, Dr. Bindman drew the following conclusion: in the adaptive learning area, the knowledge structure can be a very powerful tool, but there remain lots of difficulties to overcome:
- There must be enough connections that can be used to assess students’ knowledge states, and a large amount of data needs to be collected for specific group of people;
- For some users, there may be something wrong with the experiential connections in the database because its learning process is inconsistent in sequence with students’ learning process and the teaching process in the textbook;
- The knowledge structure does not apply to multiple-choice questions, so many courses are basically excluded;
- Finally, the knowledge structure has limited capabilities in prediction, and both knowledge and connections are binary, while there is no intermediate zone.
To solve these problems, Dr. Bindman has designed a model: PKS.
What is PKS?
PKS is an abbreviation for Probabilistic Knowledge State. Compared with the binary system, expressed as “1” or “0”, Dr. Bindman suggested expressing a student’s knowledge states with the probability of answering every question correctly at a specific time, such as {0.29, 0.87, 0.63, 0.74……}.
Any student’s PKS at any time is entirely determined by his ability in the “knowledge channel”. The knowledge channel is a pure mathematical structure during model fitting. Dr. Bindman said that he didn’t know what they represented, but after fitting, researchers could be inspired after getting to know that for a problem, which channels were very important, while which were not.
Dr. Bindman said, “You know that the knowledge channel is a block box, i.e., you don’t know how it works internally. In a sense, it’s similar to principal component analysis.”
PKS is determined by three variables: students’ ability A(t) to answer questions within the prescribed time t; question weight W(q), i.e., the correlation of the question to the knowledge channel; question core C(q), which can be understood as Bias. The value of PKS is PKS(q) = Phi[A(t)xW(q)+C(q)]], where “Phi” is a normal cumulative distribution function; “.” represents vector dot product.
This method can enable you to apply this formula to all problems at any time. You can make parallel use of this equation within time t in order to gain complete PKS for all problems at any time.
Another advantage of PKS is that students’ learning history can be fully used. When a student starts a course, he has to develop all his abilities from scratch; as he keeps learning, the model will adjust its parameters by reference to his learning history and then make a more accurate assessment of his abilities.
According to Dr. Bindman, Squirrel AI Learning by Yixue Group has started applying the PKS model to middle school mathematics teaching.
SOURCE Squirrel AI Learning
BOSTON, April 18, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — The RepTrak™ Company, the world’s leading reputation data and insights company, released its annual Global RepTrak 100 report. Utilizing its advanced reputation monitoring software, RepTrak gathered data from more than 243,000 survey responses across 14 major economies to rank the world’s 100 most reputable companies. They share that ranking alongside a full analysis of global corporate reputation trends and corresponding public sentiment in the 2024 report.
After two years of consecutive Reputation Score declines, this year’s Score is back up with an increase from 73.2 in 2023 to 73.8 in 2024. It’s a small increase after 2023’s full one-point drop. However, it’s an encouraging sign that companies have begun to recover from reputation falls driven by many challenges: macroeconomic issues, workplace difficulties, product problems, and corporate responsibility skepticism.
“This year’s report underscores a pivotal shift in the corporate landscape, spotlighting the remarkable adaptability and dedication of the Top 100 companies in responding to the dynamic needs of stakeholders,” states RepTrak CEO Mark Sonders. “The companies featured in our report are not just riding the wave of change; they are the ones steering it, proving that the best approach to business is one that embraces evolution and champions progress.”
RepTrak’s report explores how people thought, felt, and acted toward companies over the past year. Findings include notable increases in Conduct and Citizenship efforts, stakeholders’ rising willingness to invest, culturally resonant brand communications, and ESG Scores that soared despite skepticism around the acronym.
To read the full 2024 Global RepTrak 100 report, please visit: www.reptrak.com/globalreptrak
About RepTrak
The RepTrak™ Company is the world’s leading reputation data and insights company. We help companies by organizing and grading a variety of reputational elements, offering a real-world report card on their corporate reputation. Subscribers to the RepTrak program use our predictive insights to protect business value, improve return on investment, and increase their positive impact on society. RepTrak’s pairing of advanced metrics and dedicated reputation advisors offers clients an actionable analysis of their reputation data, aligning business objectives with stakeholder sentiment across different markets and sectors.
Established in 2004, The RepTrak Company owns the world’s largest reputation benchmarking database, gathering over 1 million company ratings per year used by CEOs, boards, and executives in more than 60 countries worldwide. For more information, please visit: www.reptrak.com
Logo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2391550/RepTrak_Logo_Logo.jpg
Photo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2391551/2024_GRT_Spreads__Instagram_Post.jpg
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/reptrak-announces-2024-global-reptrak-100-report-302121513.html
Artificial Intelligence
Group-IB takes part in a global operation to cripple Canadian Phishing-as-a-Service provider LabHost
SINGAPORE, April 18, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — Group-IB, a leading cybersecurity company aimed at investigating, preventing, and fight digital crime announced today that it participated in a coordinated global takedown operation against prominent Canadian Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) provider LabHost, which has led to the arrest of 37 suspects across the United Kingdom and around the world by law enforcement agencies. As part of the operation, Group-IB also conducted an extensive analysis of LabHost’s criminal history and infrastructure, including insights into LabHost’s administrative platform and the services it provides to its purported user base which exceeds 2,000 subscribers worldwide, who illegally obtained around 480,000 card numbers, 64,000 pin numbers, and over 1 million passwords from victims used for websites and other online services, according to law enforcement agencies.
“By leveraging our Threat Intelligence and Digital Risk Protection, we are able to identify and monitor phishing attacks and websites like those deployed by LabHost and its subscribers around the world, enabling us to actively alert and protect our customers, and in turn, their customers as well,” said Dmitry Volkov, Chief Executive Officer of Group-IB. “Today’s takedown operation demonstrates the agility and responsiveness of our decentralized Digital Crime Resistance Centers, and how quickly we can provide immediate and local assistance wherever our customers may be.”
First uncovered in late 2021, LabHost emerged as a fully automated Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) platform, streamlining the creation of phishing websites meticulously mirroring the interface and functionality of prominent banking, postal, and financial entities, aimed at intercepting, seizing, and profiting from users’ personal, credit card, and online banking credentials. Users are prompted to select from various “membership plans,” tailored to target businesses and individuals in either the United States and Canada, or globally, akin to mobile subscription models. These plans encompass “standard,” “premium,” and “world membership” tiers, priced between US$179 and US$300 monthly, with options for monthly, quarterly, or annual billing cycles.
For media inquiries, please contact [email protected]
Photo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2391017/Group_IB.jpgPhoto – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2391018/Group_IB_2.jpgLogo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1853638/4657466/Group_IB_Logo.jpg
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/group-ib-takes-part-in-a-global-operation-to-cripple-canadian-phishing-as-a-service-provider-labhost-302121388.html
Artificial Intelligence
Malaysia Data Center Market to Witness $3.97 Billion Investment Opportunities by 2029, Get Insights on 34 Existing Data Centers and 33 Upcoming Facilities across Malaysia – Arizton
CHICAGO, April 18, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — According to Arizton’s latest research report, the Malaysia data center market is growing at a CAGR of 13.92% during the forecast period.
To Know More, Download the Free Sample Report: https://www.arizton.com/market-reports/malaysia-data-center-market-size-analysis
Malaysia Data Center Market Report Scope
Report Attributes
Details
Market Size (Investment)
USD 3.97 Billion (2029)
Market Size (Area)
883 Thousand Sq. Feet (2029)
Market Size (Power Capacity)
163 MW (2029)
CAGR Investment (2023-2029)
13.92 %
Colocation Market Size (Revenue)
USD 1.23 Billion (2029)
Historic Year
2020-2022
Base Year
2023
Forecast Year
2024-2029
Over the next few years, Malaysia is poised to witness significant growth in data center investments, driven by the influx of operators like AirTrunk, Equinix, Princeton Digital Group, and other leading companies. Key hubs like Cyberjaya, Kuala Lumpur, and Johor Bahru are expected to see heightened activity, hosting most of the country’s data centers.
The wholesale colocation sector is projected to experience a revenue surge fueled by major cloud players like Microsoft, Google, and AWS. These companies have unveiled plans to establish dedicated cloud regions within Malaysia, with expected timelines for deployment within the next one to two years. This trend underscores Malaysia’s growing importance as a regional hub for data infrastructure and cloud services.
Malaysia is among the top expensive markets globally for developing data centers. Malaysia’s data center construction cost in 2023 stood at about $8.5-$10 million per MW, making it the costliest market in the APAC region after Singapore and Jakarta.
Investment Opportunities in the Malaysia Data Center Market
In November 2023, ST Telemedia Global Data Centres announced its plans to develop a new data center campus in Johor. The construction of the first building is likely to begin soon and become operational by 2025. The company formed a joint venture with Basis Bay to develop a new data center campus with two buildings, Cyberjaya DC.2 and STT Kuala Lumpur 1 in Cyberjaya, Selangor.In October 2023, EDGNEX Data Centres by DAMAC announced its plans to enter the APAC market for the first time; the company is considering a facility in Cyberjaya, Selangor. The expected investment can cross the $52 million mark.In October 2023, Infinaxis Data Centre Holdings, the joint venture between Gaw Capital Partners and A3 Capital, announced the construction of its first data center facility in Cyberjaya. The facility will have 10 data halls and will likely be operational by Q2 2025.In September 2023, EdgeConneX announced its plans to expand its footprint in Malaysia with the development of three data centers sites across Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, and Cyberjaya. The company plans to develop data centers in partnership with Cyberview.To Know More, Download the Free Sample Report: https://www.arizton.com/market-reports/malaysia-data-center-market-size-analysis
Market Trends
According to IRENA, in 2022, hydroenergy accounted for around 69% of the renewable energy capacity in Malaysia, followed by solar energy, which contributed about 21%, along with a 10% contribution by bioenergy.Malaysia aims to achieve the target of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. To make this goal a reality, WWF-Malaysia is partnering with Boston Consulting Group to develop an independent joint study on the country’s optimal net zero pathway.The government of Malaysia has established a green tariff scheme to support its carbon-neutrality target. Under the scheme, subscribers can get electricity from solar or hydro sources instead of fossil fuel sources.Mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, and partnerships are key strategies employed by operators to expand their portfolios and global footprint. For example:
In December 2023, Chindata Group merged with BCPE Chivalry Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of BCPE Chivalry Bidco, completing its transition to a private company from a public one.November 2023 saw ST Telemedia Global Data Centres, in a joint venture with Basis Bay, announcing plans to develop a new data center campus with two buildings in Cyberjaya, Selangor.A3 Capital and Gaw Capital Partners formed a joint venture in February 2023 to establish Infinaxis Data Centre Holdings to develop and operate data centers across Malaysia and Southeast Asia.MN Holdings, an engineering services and solutions company, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in April 2023 with Shanghai DC-Science, outlining an investment of approximately $600 million to develop a data center site at the Sedenak Tech Park, Johor.Why Should You Buy This Research?
Market size is available regarding investment, area, power capacity, and Malaysia colocation market revenue.An assessment of the data center investment in Malaysia by colocation, hyperscale, and enterprise operators.Investments in the area (square feet) and power capacity (MW) across cities in the country.A detailed study of the existing Malaysia data center market landscape, an in-depth market analysis, and insightful predictions about market size during the forecast period.Snapshot of existing and upcoming third-party data center facilities in MalaysiaFacilities Covered (Existing): 34Facilities Identified (Upcoming): 33Coverage: 9 LocationsExisting vs. Upcoming (Area)Existing vs. Upcoming (IT Load Capacity)Data Center Colocation Market in MalaysiaColocation Market Revenue & Forecast (2023-2029)Wholesale vs. Retail Colocation Revenue (2023-2029)Retail Colocation PricingWholesale Colocation PricingThe Malaysia data center market investments are classified into IT, power, cooling, and general construction services with sizing and forecast.A comprehensive analysis of the latest trends, growth rate, potential opportunities, growth restraints, and prospects for the industry.Business overview and product offerings of prominent IT infrastructure providers, construction contractors, support infrastructure providers, and investors operating in the industry.A transparent research methodology and the analysis of the demand and supply aspects of the industry.Buy this Research @ https://www.arizton.com/market-reports/malaysia-data-center-market-size-analysis
Post-Purchase Benefit
1hr of free analyst discussion10% off on customizationThe Report Includes the Investment in the Following Areas:
IT InfrastructureServersStorage SystemsNetwork InfrastructureElectrical InfrastructureUPS SystemsGeneratorsSwitches & SwitchgearsPDUsOther Electrical InfrastructureMechanical InfrastructureCooling SystemsRack CabinetsOther Mechanical InfrastructureCooling SystemsCRAC and CRAHChillersCooling Tower and Dry CoolersOther Cooling UnitsGeneral ConstructionCore & Shell DevelopmentInstallation & Commissioning ServicesBuilding & Engineering DesignFire Detection & Suppression SystemsPhysical SecurityData Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM)Tier StandardTier I & Tier IITier IIITier IV GeographySelangorJohorOther StatesVendor Landscape
IT Infrastructure Providers
Cisco SystemsDell TechnologiesFujitsuHewlett Packard EnterpriseHuawei TechnologiesIBMInspurLenovoNetAppData Center Construction Contractors & Sub-Contractors
Advance Power EngineeringAsima ArchitectsAVO TechnologyB-Global TechCTC-GlobalCSF GroupCyclect GroupDSCO GroupGamudaGCM TechnologiesHSS EngineersISGKienta Engineering ConstructionLSK EngineeringMES GroupM+W Group (Exyte)MN HoldingsNakanoNTT FACILITIESPowerware SystemsS5 EngineeringShaw ArchitectSunway Construction GroupUnique CentralSupport Infrastructure Providers
ABBCaterpillarCumminsEatonFuji ElectricHITEC Power ProtectionKOHLER PowerLegrandMitsubishi ElectricNarada Power SourcePiller Power SystemsRittalRolls-RoyceSchneider ElectricSiemensSocomecSTULZTraneVertivData Center Investors
Bridge Data CentresEdge CentresGDS ServicesIRIX (PP TELECOMMUNICATION)Keppel Data CentresNTT DATAOpen DCTM OneVantage Data CentersYTL Data Center HoldingsNew Entrants
AirTrunkAmazon Web Services (AWS)EdgeConneXEquinixFutureData (Cyclect Group + TSG Group)Googlei-BerhadInfinaxis Data Centre HoldingsMN Holdings + Shanghai DC-ScienceMicrosoftNEXTDCPrinceton Digital GroupRegal OrionSingtelST Telemedia Global Data CentresYondrTo Know More, Download the Free Sample Report: https://www.arizton.com/market-reports/malaysia-data-center-market-size-analysis
Key Questions Answered in the Report:
What factors are driving the Malaysian data center industry?
How big is the Malaysia data center market?
How many MW of power capacity will be added across Malaysia during 2024 to 2029?
What is the growth rate of the Malaysia data center market?
Which states are included in the Malaysia data center market report?
Get the Detailed TOC @ https://www.arizton.com/market-reports/malaysia-data-center-market-size-analysis
Check Out Some of the Top-Selling Research Reports:
Indonesia Data Center Market – Investment Analysis & Growth Opportunities 2024-2029
Thailand Data Center Colocation Market – Supply and Demand Analysis 2024-2029
Singapore Data Center Market – Investment Analysis & Growth Opportunities 2023-2028
Australia Data Center Market – Investment Analysis & Growth Opportunities 2023–2028
Why Arizton?
100% Customer Satisfaction
24×7 availability – we are always there when you need us
200+ Fortune 500 Companies trust Arizton’s report
80% of our reports are exclusive and first in the industry
100% more data and analysis
1500+ reports published till date
About Us:
Arizton Advisory and Intelligence is an innovative and quality-driven firm that offers cutting-edge research solutions to clients worldwide. We excel in providing comprehensive market intelligence reports and advisory and consulting services.
We offer comprehensive market research reports on consumer goods & retail technology, automotive and mobility, smart tech, healthcare, life sciences, industrial machinery, chemicals, materials, I.T. and media, logistics, and packaging. These reports contain detailed industry analysis, market size, share, growth drivers, and trend forecasts.
Arizton comprises a team of exuberant and well-experienced analysts who have mastered generating incisive reports. Our specialist analysts possess exemplary skills in market research. We train our team in advanced research practices, techniques, and ethics to outperform in fabricating impregnable research reports.
Contact UsCall: +1-312-235-2040 +1 302 469 0707 Mail: [email protected] Contact Us: https://www.arizton.com/contact-us Blog: https://www.arizton.com/blog Website: https://www.arizton.com/
Photo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2390971/Malaysia_Data_Center_Market.jpgLogo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/818553/Arizton_Logo.jpg
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/malaysia-data-center-market-to-witness-3-97-billion-investment-opportunities-by-2029–get-insights-on-34-existing-data-centers-and-33-upcoming-facilities-across-malaysia—arizton-302120944.html
-
Uncategorized7 days agoArm CEO Rene Haas will be delivering a Partner’s Event Speech at COMPUTEX 2024
-
Artificial Intelligence6 days agoIn-Depth Analysis of Germany and France Data Center Markets: Germany Poised to Contribute Over $12.24 Billion Opportunities in the Next 6 Years – Arizton
-
Uncategorized7 days ago
BJEI: A New Record of High Performance in 2023 and a New Pattern of Diversified and Coordinated Development
-
Uncategorized7 days ago
Integrity Food Marketing Joins Forces with CA Ferolie to Expand East Coast Reach from Maine to Florida
-
Uncategorized7 days ago
Dimethyl Carbonate Market worth $1.9 billion by 2028 – Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets™
-
Artificial Intelligence6 days agoCogX Festival Set to Debut in Los Angeles at Century Plaza on May 7th, 2024
-
Artificial Intelligence6 days ago
aelf Leads the Fusion of AI and Blockchain to Shape the Future of Technology
-
Artificial Intelligence6 days agoXinhua Silk Road: Zoomlion Access pursues high-quality development with aerial work machinery sector innovation
