Measuring Businesses’ ESG Performance a Growing Challenge Standard Measures and Data Needed

0
24

The rapid growth of investment based on environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria requires innovation and co-operation to create reliable risk disclosure systems, speakers said at the “Integration of ESG and Climate Risks in Investment Management” virtual conference hosted by Imperial College Business School, Brevan Howard Centre for Financial Analysis and Ping An Technology, a member of Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. (hereafter “Ping An” or the “Group”, HKEX: 2318; SSE: 601318).

With increasing numbers of investment managers seeking to integrate ESG factors into their portfolio management decisions, the challenge of measuring and comparing companies’ ESG performance is growing in importance. Advances in technology are making more sophisticated analysis tools available, speakers said, but there are different views on what data is relevant and how disclosure frameworks should be standardized.

Ping An: Understand ourselves first

Ping An’s fintech arm, OneConnect Financial Technology, is developing intelligent tools for companies to gather their own ESG data for publication. “We need to understand ourselves first,” said Tan Bin Ru, OneConnect Southeast Asia CEO. “Our platform monitors 400 indicators across the 40 units of Ping An Group, then places us in a wider context by adding intelligence which benchmarks us against our industry peers.”

While such insight is invaluable to the company, regulations set out how companies report this data to the market. “The Hong Kong Stock Exchange has worked to standardize disclosure of ESG risks,” said Grace Hui, Head of Green and Sustainable Finance at Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX). “As a regulator and exchange operator, we must supervise fair and orderly ESG markets – listed companies must comply and commit to conduct their business well.”

Balanced targets

A Singapore Exchange (SGX) survey on ESG disclosures by Singapore-listed companies showed issues are concerned about differing ESG risk criteria and frameworks. They called for more guidance on environmental standards, particularly regarding greenhouse gas emissions. “Companies tend to disclose their successes, so those reporting less favorable numbers are the minority,” said Herry Cho, Head of Sustainability and Sustainable Finance at SGX. “But providing detail on progress over time is essential, so we are encouraging more balanced target-setting.”

While regulators set the rules for companies to follow, the responsibility for implementing policies and setting objectives falls on company management. “ESG is more than a label – people need to look at what’s underneath,” said Christine Chow, Global Head of Strategic Governance, IHS Markit. “Companies shouldn’t see ESG as a compliance issue: it is a strategy option which over time should be embedded in all aspects of the business.”

Ping An’s OneConnect has partnered with the SingaporeShanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges to establish systems that enable listed companies to gather and analyze comprehensive ESG data in ways that are comparable and actionable. Companies can generate detailed reports with valuable insights at the peer group, sector and country levels.

Disclosure linked with performance

Companies that work to quantify and disclose their ESG risks can generate even greater value. Ping An’s research partnership with Imperial College Business School has used artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze how well listed companies are covering key ESG themes in their reports. “This work has also established a statistically significant relationship between disclosures and companies’ financial performance,” said Enrico Biffis, Associate Professor of Finance, Imperial College Business School. “NLP (natural language processing) analysis of climate indicators can flag which companies are objectively greener than others – essentially exposing greenwashing.”

For investors, a lack of a comprehensive ESG taxonomy, a classification system of environmentally sustainable economic activities, is the major stumbling block for assessing companies’ ESG credentials. Lise Renelleau, Head of Sustainability, Rosenberg Equities at AXA Investment Management, said investors are being proactive. “We need a new ecosystem to deliver a new ESG and climate taxonomy. Investors need to understand these elements even if it means spending time and resources,” she explains. “We recommend starting from broad principles – for example, how your portfolios support the Paris [Agreement] goals.”

Ian Simm, founder and CEO of Impax Asset Management, stressed that the three elements of ESG – environment, social and governance, “are less three separate terms but more a prompt for companies to do better – not a box-ticking exercise but a radar sweep to take in the whole picture of a company with a focus on materiality. And this will lead to better information and assessment of risks and opportunities, as well as cost of capital for the companies.”

Ocean of data

The question of how to apply ESG data to address real-world climate impacts through investment decisions concerned several speakers. “Actionable data can be the basis for creating a range of investment aids and products,” said Chex Yu, Deputy Director of Strategy at Ping An Technology. “These extend the usefulness of information to create long-term insights.”

The risk of being swamped by too much unfocused data can be managed with smart technology, said Vanessa Barnett, Global Head of ESG at FactSet. “Data integration makes the datasets work together to produce actionable insights,” she said. “Regulation can define what is disclosed and in what formats, but vendors enable companies and investors to share data and compare like with like.”

Helena Fung, Head of Sustainable Investment, Asia Pacific, at FTSE Russell, said that well-designed benchmarks can help embed sustainable practices at listed companies by directing investor funds to companies that are well-managed. “Newer benchmarks can help with transition pathways by setting standards for management quality and carbon performance,” she said. “We’re seeing more and more passive investing which dovetails well with sustainable benchmarks.”

The conference speakers representing corporations, investors, vendors and regulators were unanimous in acknowledging the importance of technology and data partnerships to ESG integration in investment management. “It takes an ecosystem approach to unite the many players engaged in ESG investing,” said Sohee Park, Chief Product Officer, Ping An Technology. “Data and technology are powerful tools, but working together to share our insights is what makes complex systems work.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here