Connect with us
European Gaming Congress 2024

Uncategorized

Studies Show AI Chatbots Provide Inconsistent Accuracy for Musculoskeletal Health Information

Published

on

studies-show-ai-chatbots-provide-inconsistent-accuracy-for-musculoskeletal-health-information

 
With the growing popularity of large language model (LLM) chatbots, a type of artificial intelligence (AI) used by ChatGPT, Google Bard and BingAI, it is important to outline the accuracy of musculoskeletal health information they provide. Three new studies presented at the 2024 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) analyzed the validity of the information chatbots gave to patients for certain orthopaedic procedures, assessing the accuracy of how chatbots present research advancements and clinical decision making.
While the studies found that certain chatbots provide concise summaries across a wide spectrum of orthopaedic conditions, each demonstrated limited accuracy depending on the category. Researchers agree that orthopaedic surgeons remain the most reliable source of information. The findings will help those in the field understand the efficacy of these AI tools, if the use by patients or non-specialist colleagues could introduce bias or misconceptions and how future enhancements can make chatbots a potentially valuable tool for patients and physicians in the future.
STUDY OVERVIEWS AND OUTCOMESPotential misinformation and dangers associated with clinical use of LLM chatbotsThis study, led by Branden Sosa, a fourth-year medical student at Weill Cornell Medicine, assessed the accuracy of Open AI ChatGPT 4.0, Google Bard and BingAI chatbots to explain basic orthopaedic concepts, integrate clinical information and address patient queries. Each chatbot was prompted to answer 45 orthopaedic-related questions spanning categories of “Bone Physiology,” “Referring Physician,” and “Patient Query” and then assessed for accuracy. Two independent, blinded reviewers scored responses on a scale of 0-4, assessing accuracy, completeness and useability. Responses were analyzed for strengths and limitations within categories and across chatbots. The research team found the following trends:

When prompted with orthopedic questions, OpenAI ChatGPT, Google Bard and BingAI provided correct answers that covered the most critical salient points in 76.7%, 33% and 16.7% of queries, respectively.
When providing clinical management suggestions, all chatbots displayed significant limitations by deviating from the standard of care and omitting critical steps in workup such as ordering antibiotics before cultures or neglecting to include key studies in diagnostic workup.
When asked less complex patient queries, ChatGPT and Google Bard were able to provide mostly accurate responses but often failed to elicit critical medical history pertinent to fully address the query.
A careful analysis of citations provided by chatbots revealed an oversampling of a small number of references and 10 faulty links that were nonfunctional or led to incorrect articles.

Is ChatGPT ready for prime time? Assessing the accuracy of AI in answering common arthroplasty patient questionsResearchers, led by Jenna A. Bernstein, MD, orthopaedic surgeon at Connecticut Orthopaedics, sought to investigate how accurately ChatGPT 4.0 answered patient questions by developing a list of 80 commonly asked patient questions about knee and hip replacements. Each question was queried two times in ChatGPT; first asking the questions as written, and then prompting the ChatGPT to answer the patient questions “as an orthopaedic surgeon.” Each surgeon on the team evaluated the accuracy of each set of answers and rated these on a scale of one to four. Agreement was assessed between the two surgeons’ evaluation of each set of ChatGPT answers. The association between the question prompt and response accuracy were both assessed using two means of statistical analysis (Cohen’s kappa and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively). The findings included:

When assessing the quality of the ChatGPT responses, 26% (21 of 80 responses) had an average scale of three (partially accurate, but incomplete) or less when asked without a prompt, and 8% (six of 80 responses) had an average grade of less than three when preceded by a prompt. As such, researchers summarized that ChatGPT is still not an adequate resource to answer patient questions and further work to develop an accurate orthopaedic-focused chatbot is needed.
ChatGPT performed substantially better when appropriately prompted to answer patient questions “as an orthopaedic surgeon” with 92% accuracy.

Can ChatGPT 4.0 be used to answer patient questions concerning the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability?Researchers at the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York, led by Kyle Kunze, MD, assessed the propensity for ChatGPT 4.0 to provide medical information about the Latarjet procedure for patients with anterior shoulder instability. The overall goal of this study was to understand whether this chatbot could demonstrate potential to serve as a clinical adjunct and help both patients and providers through providing accurate medical information.
To answer this question, the team first conducted a Google search using the query “Latarjet” to extract the top ten frequently asked questions (FAQs) and associated sources concerning the procedure. They then asked ChatGPT to perform the same search for FAQs to identify the questions and sources provided by the chatbot. Highlights of the findings included:

Advertisement
Stake.com

ChatGPT demonstrated the ability to provide a broad range of clinically relevant questions and answers and derived information from academic sources 100% of the time. This is in opposition to Google, which included a small percentage of academic resources, combined with information found on surgeons’ personal websites and larger medical practices.
The most common question category for both ChatGPT and Google was technical details (40%); however, ChatGPT also presented information concerning risks/complications (30%), recovery timeline (20%) and evaluation of surgery (10%).

The post Studies Show AI Chatbots Provide Inconsistent Accuracy for Musculoskeletal Health Information appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Stake.com

Uncategorized

The EU AI Act Finalized: Implications for Employment Law and Compliance

Published

on

the-eu-ai-act-finalized:-implications-for-employment-law-and-compliance

 
The European Union (EU) has finalized the AI Act, a comprehensive regulatory framework designed to address the ethical, legal, and societal implications of artificial intelligence (AI). This landmark legislation has significant implications for employment law and compliance, affecting how organizations develop, deploy, and manage AI technologies. This article explores the key provisions of the EU AI Act and its impact on employment law and compliance.
Overview of the EU AI Act
The EU AI Act aims to ensure that AI technologies are developed and used in a manner that respects fundamental rights, promotes transparency, and mitigates risks. The legislation categorizes AI systems into different risk levels, imposing varying requirements based on the potential impact on individuals and society.
Key Provisions:

Risk-Based Approach: AI systems are categorized into four risk levels: unacceptable risk, high risk, limited risk, and minimal risk. High-risk AI systems are subject to stricter regulatory requirements.
Transparency and Accountability: Organizations must ensure transparency and accountability in the development and deployment of AI systems, including providing clear information about the functioning and decision-making processes.
Human Oversight: High-risk AI systems must incorporate human oversight to ensure that AI decisions can be reviewed and contested.
Data Governance: The Act imposes strict data governance requirements to ensure the quality, accuracy, and fairness of data used in AI systems.

Implications for Employment Law
The EU AI Act has significant implications for employment law, affecting how organizations use AI technologies in hiring, performance evaluation, and workplace monitoring.
Key Implications:

Fair Hiring Practices: AI systems used in hiring and recruitment must ensure fairness and non-discrimination, avoiding biases that could adversely impact candidates.
Performance Evaluation: AI-driven performance evaluation systems must be transparent and provide employees with the opportunity to contest decisions.
Workplace Monitoring: AI technologies used for workplace monitoring must respect employees’ privacy and comply with data protection regulations.

Compliance Requirements
Organizations must comply with the EU AI Act’s requirements to ensure the ethical and legal use of AI technologies. Compliance involves several key steps and considerations.
Compliance Steps:

Advertisement
Stake.com

Risk Assessment: Conducting a thorough risk assessment to categorize AI systems and determine the applicable regulatory requirements.
Transparency Measures: Implementing measures to ensure transparency in AI decision-making processes, including clear documentation and communication with affected individuals.
Human Oversight: Establishing mechanisms for human oversight and intervention in AI decision-making processes, particularly for high-risk AI systems.
Data Management: Ensuring robust data governance practices to maintain the quality, accuracy, and fairness of data used in AI systems.

Challenges in Compliance
Complying with the EU AI Act presents several challenges for organizations, requiring careful planning and execution.
Key Challenges:

Complexity: The complexity of the regulatory requirements can be challenging to navigate, particularly for organizations with multiple AI systems.
Data Management: Ensuring data quality and fairness requires robust data management practices and continuous monitoring.
Resource Allocation: Implementing compliance measures can be resource-intensive, requiring investment in technology, personnel, and training.

The Role of HR and Compliance Teams
Human resources (HR) and compliance teams play a critical role in ensuring that organizations comply with the EU AI Act and address its implications for employment law.
Key Responsibilities:

Policy Development: Developing and implementing policies that align with the EU AI Act’s requirements and promote ethical AI use.
Training and Education: Providing training and education for employees on the ethical and legal implications of AI technologies.
Monitoring and Auditing: Continuously monitoring and auditing AI systems to ensure compliance and address any issues that arise.

Advertisement
Stake.com

Future Prospects
The EU AI Act represents a significant step towards regulating AI technologies and ensuring their ethical and legal use. As organizations adapt to the new regulatory landscape, the focus will be on developing AI systems that are transparent, fair, and accountable.
Future Trends:

Innovation in Compliance: The development of innovative compliance solutions, such as AI-driven compliance tools, will help organizations navigate the regulatory landscape.
Global Impact: The EU AI Act is expected to influence AI regulation globally, setting a benchmark for other jurisdictions to follow.
Continuous Improvement: Organizations will continue to improve their AI systems and compliance practices, fostering a culture of ethical AI use.

Conclusion
The finalization of the EU AI Act has significant implications for employment law and compliance, requiring organizations to ensure the ethical and legal use of AI technologies. By adhering to the Act’s provisions and implementing robust compliance measures, organizations can navigate the complex regulatory landscape and promote transparency, fairness, and accountability in their AI systems. As the AI regulatory landscape continues to evolve, organizations must remain vigilant and proactive in addressing the ethical and legal challenges associated with AI.
Source of the news: SHRM
The post The EU AI Act Finalized: Implications for Employment Law and Compliance appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Medtech Compliance: Not Regulation, but Innovation

Published

on

medtech-compliance:-not-regulation,-but-innovation

 
The medical technology (Medtech) industry is at the forefront of healthcare innovation, developing cutting-edge solutions that improve patient outcomes and streamline healthcare delivery. However, compliance remains a critical concern, with regulatory requirements often viewed as a barrier to innovation. This article explores how compliance, rather than stifling innovation, can drive it by fostering a culture of quality, safety, and continuous improvement in the Medtech industry.
The Compliance Challenge in Medtech
The Medtech industry is subject to stringent regulatory requirements to ensure the safety and efficacy of medical devices. Compliance with these regulations is essential but can be resource-intensive and complex.
Key Compliance Requirements:

FDA Regulations: In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates medical devices, requiring rigorous testing and documentation to ensure safety and effectiveness.
EU MDR: The European Union’s Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR) sets stringent requirements for the marketing and distribution of medical devices in the EU.
ISO Standards: International standards, such as ISO 13485, provide a framework for quality management systems in the Medtech industry.

Compliance as a Driver of Innovation
While compliance is often seen as a barrier to innovation, it can also drive innovation by promoting a culture of quality and continuous improvement.
How Compliance Drives Innovation:

Quality Assurance: Compliance with regulatory requirements ensures that medical devices meet high standards of quality and safety, fostering trust and confidence among healthcare providers and patients.
Risk Management: Effective compliance programs help identify and mitigate risks, reducing the likelihood of product recalls and adverse events.
Continuous Improvement: Regulatory requirements encourage Medtech companies to continuously improve their processes and products, leading to innovative solutions that address unmet medical needs.
Market Access: Compliance with global regulatory standards enables Medtech companies to access international markets, expanding their reach and driving growth.

Balancing Compliance and Innovation
Medtech companies must strike a balance between compliance and innovation, ensuring that regulatory requirements do not stifle creativity and progress.
Strategies for Balancing Compliance and Innovation:

Advertisement
Stake.com

Integrated Compliance Programs: Developing integrated compliance programs that align with the company’s innovation goals and support a culture of quality and safety.
Collaborative Approach: Collaborating with regulatory agencies, industry partners, and stakeholders to develop innovative solutions that meet regulatory requirements.
Leveraging Technology: Utilizing advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, to streamline compliance processes and enhance product development.
Continuous Training: Providing continuous training and education for employees to ensure they understand and adhere to regulatory requirements while fostering a culture of innovation.

Case Studies of Compliance-Driven Innovation
Several Medtech companies have successfully leveraged compliance as a driver of innovation, demonstrating that regulatory requirements can enhance, rather than hinder, progress.
Case Study Examples:

Innovative Product Development: A Medtech company developed a new medical device that met stringent regulatory requirements, resulting in a product that was safer and more effective than existing solutions.
Streamlined Approval Process: By developing a robust compliance program, a Medtech company streamlined the regulatory approval process, bringing their innovative product to market faster.
Global Market Access: Compliance with international standards enabled a Medtech company to expand into global markets, driving growth and innovation.

The Role of Regulatory Agencies
Regulatory agencies play a crucial role in fostering a compliance-driven culture of innovation in the Medtech industry.
Regulatory Agency Initiatives:

Innovation Pathways: Developing innovation pathways and expedited approval processes for breakthrough medical devices that address unmet medical needs.
Collaborative Partnerships: Forming collaborative partnerships with industry stakeholders to develop regulatory frameworks that support innovation.
Guidance and Support: Providing guidance and support to Medtech companies to help them navigate the regulatory landscape and develop compliant, innovative solutions.

Advertisement
Stake.com

Conclusion
Compliance in the Medtech industry is not a barrier to innovation but a driver of quality, safety, and continuous improvement. By fostering a culture of compliance and leveraging regulatory requirements as a catalyst for innovation, Medtech companies can develop cutting-edge solutions that improve patient outcomes and advance healthcare delivery. As the industry continues to evolve, balancing compliance and innovation will be essential for driving progress and ensuring the safety and efficacy of medical devices.
Source of the news: STAT News
The post Medtech Compliance: Not Regulation, but Innovation appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Can AI Help Banks Navigate Regulatory Compliance?

Published

on

can-ai-help-banks-navigate-regulatory-compliance?

 
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the banking industry, providing innovative solutions to enhance operational efficiency, customer experience, and regulatory compliance. This article examines how AI can help banks navigate the complex regulatory compliance landscape, highlighting the benefits, challenges, and potential applications of AI in compliance.
The Regulatory Compliance Challenge
Banks operate in a highly regulated environment, with stringent requirements to ensure the integrity and stability of the financial system. Compliance with regulations such as anti-money laundering (AML), counter-terrorist financing (CTF), and data protection is crucial but can be resource-intensive and complex.
Key Compliance Requirements:

AML and CTF: Banks must monitor transactions to detect and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing activities.
Data Protection: Ensuring the privacy and security of customer data is paramount, particularly in light of regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Reporting: Banks are required to submit detailed reports to regulators, demonstrating compliance with various regulatory requirements.

AI Applications in Regulatory Compliance
AI technologies offer a range of applications that can help banks streamline compliance processes, improve accuracy, and reduce costs.
Key AI Applications:

Transaction Monitoring: AI algorithms can analyze transaction data in real-time to identify suspicious activities and flag potential AML and CTF violations.
Customer Due Diligence: AI can automate the process of customer due diligence (CDD), verifying customer identities, and assessing risk profiles.
Regulatory Reporting: AI-powered tools can automate the collection, analysis, and submission of regulatory reports, ensuring timely and accurate compliance.
Risk Management: AI can analyze large datasets to identify and assess risks, enabling proactive risk management and mitigation.

Benefits of AI in Compliance
The integration of AI in regulatory compliance offers several benefits for banks, helping them navigate the complex regulatory landscape more effectively.
Key Benefits:

Advertisement
Stake.com

Efficiency: AI-driven automation reduces the time and effort required for compliance tasks, allowing banks to allocate resources more efficiently.
Accuracy: AI algorithms can process and analyze data with high precision, minimizing the risk of human error and ensuring accurate compliance.
Cost Savings: By automating compliance processes, AI can significantly reduce operational costs associated with regulatory compliance.
Scalability: AI solutions can scale to handle large volumes of data and transactions, making them suitable for banks of all sizes.

Challenges in Implementing AI for Compliance
Despite the benefits, implementing AI-driven compliance solutions also presents several challenges that banks must address.
Key Challenges:

Data Quality: The effectiveness of AI in compliance depends on the quality and completeness of the data. Banks must ensure that their data is accurate and up-to-date.
Regulatory Uncertainty: The regulatory landscape for AI is still evolving, and banks must stay abreast of new regulations and guidelines to ensure compliance.
Integration: Integrating AI solutions with existing systems and processes can be complex and requires careful planning and execution.
Ethical Considerations: Banks must consider the ethical implications of using AI, including issues related to transparency, fairness, and accountability.

Future Prospects of AI in Compliance
The future of AI-driven compliance in banking looks promising, with ongoing advancements in technology and increasing regulatory acceptance. As AI continues to evolve, it is expected to play an even more significant role in enhancing regulatory compliance and risk management.
Future Trends:

Advanced Analytics: The use of advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms will enable more sophisticated risk detection and management.
RegTech Solutions: Regulatory technology (RegTech) solutions that leverage AI will become more prevalent, providing banks with innovative tools to streamline compliance.
Collaboration with Regulators: Increased collaboration between banks and regulators will drive the development of AI standards and best practices for compliance.
Personalized Compliance: AI will enable personalized compliance solutions tailored to the specific needs and risk profiles of individual banks.

Advertisement
Stake.com

Conclusion
AI has the potential to revolutionize regulatory compliance in banking, offering significant benefits in terms of efficiency, accuracy, and scalability. While there are challenges to overcome, the future prospects of AI-driven compliance are bright, with ongoing advancements and increased regulatory acceptance paving the way for more innovative and effective solutions. As banks continue to embrace AI, they will be better equipped to navigate the complex regulatory landscape and ensure compliance in the digital age.
Source of the news: BizTech Magazine
The post Can AI Help Banks Navigate Regulatory Compliance? appeared first on HIPTHER Alerts.

Continue Reading

Trending